Video transcript
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
95 statements · 1 politicians · May 19, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 95 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Regulatory Policy, Agriculture & Agribusiness, Fiscal Reform, Party Membership.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
95 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
Mr. President, this is a project of utmost importance.
- Neutral
About: use technical opinion to ban productive activity
Today, unfortunately, in Brazil an agency is being used illegally as a basis for Ibama to prohibit productive activity.
- Neutral
About: prohibit cultivation of species based on classification as invasive
So, simply for being considered an invasive or exotic species, prohibitions are occurring; indeed, in new studies there are moves to even ban the cultivation of mango and guava in Brazil because of these abuses that have happened, for example in the case of tilapia and tambaqui.
- Neutral
About: classify species as invasive
Tambaqui is not an exotic species, but it is considered an invasive species.
- Neutral
About: use subordinate regulation to prohibit production of native species
So, this concerns a Brazilian fish against which there is action under an infra-legal norm, attempting to sabotage production within Brazil, to prohibit production within Brazil.
- Neutral
About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species
This is already a symbol of backwardness that we are experiencing, because today the world's largest exporter of tambaqui is not Brazil but Asian countries.
- Neutral
About: remove restrictions that prevent production and export of native species
So, we are already so behind and we sabotage ourselves so much, we put so many shackles on our own feet, on our own hands, that we condemn ourselves to underdevelopment.
- Neutral
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
What this bill does is, basically, give the Ministry of Agriculture — as is done in practically most developed countries — the authority regarding the cultivation, breeding, husbandry, transport, processing and commercialization of species used in productive activity, leaving this technical criterion to be evaluated by the Ministry of Agriculture.
About: limit environmental agency's role to preparing lists of exotic and invasive species
There is nothing in the world parallel to what we have, an agency that should only make a list — as it has always done and should continue doing — about what is an exotic species and what is an invasive species.
About: maintain issuance of technical opinions on exotic and invasive species
It is important for us to have that technical opinion.
About: prevent Ibama from using technical opinions to prohibit cultivation, processing and breeding of productive species
Now, that opinion does not have legal power, it should not and never did — it only started to have it now, with the Lula Government — to be used by Ibama to prohibit cultivation, to prohibit processing, to prohibit the breeding of species that only generate employment and income for our country, including the case I already mentioned of tambaqui, which is Brazilian and for which a restriction is being discussed to breed it in Brazil, and a restriction on tilapia reproduction, which affects mainly small producers.
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
So, Mr. President, this is an absolutely reasonable bill.
About: transfer authority over cultivation, management and commercialization of species to the Ministry of Agriculture
I find it regrettable that the Lula Government is opposed to this matter.
- Neutral
About: remove regulatory constraints on the agricultural sector
I think it's a setback for Brazilian producers, a setback for the country's development that, in one of the few areas where we have significant productivity growth in Brazil, of about 2.5% per year on average, which is agribusiness, we put the shackles on ourselves — we sabotage ourselves, we don't even need our external adversaries for that.
About: approve the bill that transfers authority over species to the Ministry of Agriculture
Therefore, my recommendation is in favor, Mr. President.
- Against
About: reduce taxes without cutting public spending or indicating a funding source
Mr. President, MISSÃO's vote is "no," because there is no tax cut without spending cuts.
- Against
About: implement tax reform to rebalance burdens between sectors and reduce taxes on investment and exports
If we grant tax relief to a productive sector without presenting the estimated impact, the revenue source, in the end either we will increase property taxes on other productive activities — so it will weigh on industry, on commerce, on services — or, ultimately, this will turn into an increase in the CBS rate, the Brazilian VAT, increasing the worst tax of all, which is the tax on consumption.
- Against
About: increase consumption taxes without regressive compensation
This discourages consumption, obviously, because taxes become more expensive, and, at the same time, it mainly penalizes the poorest, who consume the majority of their income, because there is nothing left to invest, nothing left to save.
- Against
About: approve tax cuts without estimate of revenue loss and funding source
So any tax-cut bill that does not present the estimate of revenue foregone and, at the same time, the source of that spending, is either an increase in debt, or an increase in inflation, or an increase in taxes for other productive sectors.
- Against
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
Mr. President, this bill is a mockery. Look, we are saying that a political party will be able to parcel its debts over 15 years — 15 years of debt installment for a political party — and will only need to start paying one year after the conviction becomes final.
- Against
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
No ordinary citizen, no company has the condition, the right to be able to pay only one year after the conviction and still parcel it over 15 years, with public money, with money from the electoral fund, with money from the party fund.
- Against
About: prevent parties from being punished with ineligibility for irregularities in accounts
Furthermore, you cannot punish the political party, prevent it from contesting the elections, in case of irregularities in its accounts.
- Neutral
About: misuse of party funds to acquire private assets
There have already been cases of a party that bought a small jet, that bought a helicopter, that bought a meat grinder, that bought a mansion.
- Against
About: allow parties to spread party debts over up to 15 years and have protection from seizure and asset freezes
That party will not be able to be sanctioned, be prohibited from participating in elections, for using public money that should actually go to health and education, to do a personal business. So, the orientation is "no," Mr. President.
About: record the favorable orientation of the Mission Party
Madam President, I ask that the Missão Party's favorable orientation be recorded.
About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes
I want to congratulate Deputy Minister Osmar Terra for the initiative.
About: toughen penalties for pedophilia crimes
We will do everything to toughen penalties regarding pedophilia.
About: prohibit and penalize production and consumption of child pornography, including AI-generated
Even if it is produced with artificial intelligence, we know that the consumption of this type of content leads, later, to the commission of sexual crimes physically and in person, not just to the storage of child pornography.
About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes
Unfortunately, we were not able to vote last week for a longer period of confinement for those minors who commit rapes, like the very sad case we saw of four adolescents who raped two children.
About: increase detention time for minors who commit serious crimes
The Lula Government's base, the PT, did not allow us to vote for a harsher punishment for adolescent rapists, in the historical defense they already make of underage criminals.
About: approve bill that toughens measures against pedophilia
But this bill from Deputy Osmar Terra is already a big step forward in combating pedophilia. Thank you.
Madam President, look at what we are doing here with this bill.
I call the attention of all parties that claim to defend the worker.
- Neutral
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
The bill is saying the following: if a party hires a worker and defaults on labor payments, if it does not pay INSS, if it does not pay FGTS, that party cannot be subject to attachment.
- Against
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
Well, the PT, which voted in favor of urgency, does it not claim to defend the worker so much?
- Against
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
So, does that mean the PT can stiff the worker?
- Against
About: prevent seizure of party assets for labor debts
Would an employer be allowed to adopt the conduct that is being foreseen in this bill!
- Neutral
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
An employer will owe taxes! They will be subject to attachment.
- Neutral
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
They take everything, they take the employer's house, they don't take just the company.
- Neutral
About: seize assets of delinquent business owners
If an employer cheats or delays any labor payment!
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology