Video transcript
Pela Ordem / Explicação Pessoal
21 statements · 1 politicians · March 18, 2026
Statements by Marcos Rogério. 21 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Legislative Process, Violence Against Women and Protection, Digital environment regulation, Extremism and Hate Speech.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
21 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
About: clarify and debate the text approved in the Chamber of Deputies before voting
So, in that respect, Mr. President, if Your Excellency wishes to hear, I have the arguments as to why we need to have a more in-depth debate.
We are dealing with an important matter.
About: approve measures to increase women's safety
Look, no one disputes the importance of discussing measures to combat violence against women — I think it is an important agenda and has our full support — but you cannot, under the argument that we are legislating to protect, create legislation that is open-ended, abstract and which, in fact, represents yet another instrument for content control on social networks.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
This is a bill that goes beyond the very core of the debate here.
About: refer the bill to the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) for analysis
First point: it deals with indeterminate legal concepts. This is a matter for the CCJ to debate, this is a matter for the CCJ to examine in depth.
- Neutral
About: define legal concepts of hate speech and misogyny in the law
Hate speech, misogyny... What is the legal definition of that?
- Neutral
About: define legal concepts of hate speech and misogyny in the law
What is the tradition? What is the foundation for that?
About: define legal concepts of hate speech and misogyny in the law
It is not found in doctrine, it is not found in case law, yet we are legislating and pointing this out as the guiding thread of a policy of repression of crimes.
- Against
About: impose filtering and traceability obligations on platforms and private messaging services
Another aspect: permanent monitoring of content, traceability in private messaging services.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
We are talking about content control! The argument is: "No, we are talking here, because of the crimes and the violence that exist, about digital violence."
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
Okay, but the bill cannot determine — nor could it be otherwise — in a clear, objective manner what the scope of the norm is.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
We are dealing with provisions that will receive the most elastic possible interpretation in order to generate content control on the network.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
And here it is prior restraint, content control, censorship.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
Who controls? What controls? Who will we be at the mercy of?
- Against
About: impose filtering and traceability obligations on platforms and private messaging services
Another situation: it shifts to the platforms themselves the need for a filter, for a control that represents what we have fought against over time, and I took part when we voted on the Marco Civil da Internet law.
About: guarantee freedom of expression
We spoke of freedom of the network, of net neutrality, of freedom of expression.
Obviously we must be concerned today with technological advances.
About: approve measures to increase women's safety
Are there limits? Yes. But we cannot approve a bill on the grounds that it is intended to protect women when, in truth, it opens the way to content control and control of the networks.
About: approve measures to increase women's safety
So, I would make an appeal to Your Excellency, without entering into further detail on the issues of this bill, that it be referred to the CCJ, since it has not passed through any Committee, so that we can have this debate in the appropriate forum and bring to the Plenary a mature bill, a bill with a truly secure text that gives us the confidence to vote, because, I repeat, Mr. President, I am in favor of toughening criminal and civil legislation with respect to crimes, especially crimes against women.
About: approve measures to increase women's safety
My state, for example, has extremely high rates and they must be tackled.
- Against
About: approve measures to regulate and remove harmful content on digital platforms
But we cannot use a situation like this to pass legislation that is indeterminate in nature and that represents a project of censorship, a project of control.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology