Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about replace minimum water tariff with a tariff structure of fixed and variable components, without minimum consumption charges

About: replace minimum water tariff with a tariff structure of fixed and variable components, without minimum consumption charges

Kim Kataguiri: So, we move to the vote, Mr. President. "Rapporteur's Vote a) Assumptions of constitutionality, legality and legislative technique Regarding formal constitutionality, all aspects related to legislative competence, the legitimacy of parliamentary initiative and the appropriate instrument for addressing the matter were respected.

Kim Kataguiri: The Union holds exclusive competence to legislate on national guidelines for basic sanitation (art. 21, XX, of the Federal Constitution), the matter is not subject to any kind of reserved initiative, and an ordinary law is the appropriate vehicle.

As to the analysis of the material constitutionality of the proposals, there is nothing that taints the bills, which conform to the principles and rules emanating from the Federal Constitution.

Kim Kataguiri · 76:39

Kim Kataguiri: As for legality, we consider that the legislative proposal is legal, insofar as it innovates the legal order and respects the general principles of law.

Kim Kataguiri: The legislative technique and wording used in the bill are adequate, fully complying with the Brazilian Norm of Legislation Drafting (Complementary Law No. 95 of 1998). b) Merit The charging of a "minimum tariff" or "consumption allowance" stems from a logic of presumed volume which, although historically used to ensure revenue predictability, today produces socially unjust and environmentally inadequate effects.

Why it was classified this way · 78% confidence

declares that there is no material constitutional defect in the bill.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology