Video transcript
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Presencial (AM nº 123/2020)
25 statements · 1 politicians · May 26, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 25 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Political Violence & Impunity, Public Safety and Order, Political Rights, Digital environment regulation.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
25 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
- Neutral
About: approve a bill that protects against gender-based political violence
Mr. President, Members of the Chamber of Deputies, the bill, as set out in its summary, intends to protect against gender-based political violence.
- Against
About: guarantee protection for Black political leaders and activists
But when you read the text, you see there are some jabutis in it, for example the inclusion of special protection and privileges, in reality, for leaders who will be placed above ordinary citizens.
- Against
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
So, leaders of human rights NGOs, party leaders, will receive special treatment from the police, often with guaranteed police escorts and attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office, more than an ordinary citizen.
- Against
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
Personally, I don't think there should be any legal privilege or special police protection or special attention from the Public Prosecutor for any representative, just because he is part of a human rights NGO.
Moreover, most of these NGOs criticize the police themselves.
- Neutral
About: grant police escort to leaders provided for by law
The law guarantees them police escorts.
There is generally fierce, and often unfair, criticism when the police act in the lawful exercise of their rights, in the regular performance of their duties.
- Against
About: regulate algorithmic manipulation and content boosting on social networks
There are also other absolutely subjective points regarding artificial manipulation of algorithms, boosting.
About: ensure that content removal on social networks respects due process and adversarial rights
Recently, we had an illegal decree by the Lula Government granting superpowers to the Attorney General's Office and to the ANPD to take social media content down concerning opinions about the Government's public policies, which can be analyzed subjectively, without the right to a judicial process, without adversarial proceedings, without full defense.
- Against
About: authorize public bodies to remove social media content without a court order
Once again, there is the text of a law here that, if approved, increases the subjective power to censor speech on social networks.
- Against
About: criminalize statements that belittle or denigrate gender identity
Another point here, once again raising an always-controversial topic in this chamber, about respect for gender identity — anything that belittles or that has the character of denigrating gender identity.
- Against
About: impose legal limits on freedom of expression
Well, if I say, for example, that a trans woman is a biological man, would that be classified as a crime under the law?
- Against
About: require digital platforms to remove content without a court order
Will my remark, this speech of mine, be censored?
- Against
About: criminalize speech made in religious institutions about gender identity
If in a church, for example, there is some statement regarding gender identity, could that be criminalized, could it be censored?
- Against
About: guarantee protection for Black political leaders and activists
Once again, Mr. President, under the noble, just and worthy pretext of promoting protection for women, there are passages that are absolutely subjective and outside the scope of the matter that grant the privilege of police escort and attention from the MPF to people who are part of certain NGOs — privileges I see no reason for — and also a curtailment of freedom of expression on social networks and, once again, especially regarding gender identity, which is why I instruct against it and request a roll-call vote, Mr. President.
Mr. President, it's even worse than I said from the floor.
- Against
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
We have here special attention from the Police and the MPF for union leaders, for those who hold leadership positions in private institutions.
- Against
About: grant special police protection and priority attention from the Public Prosecutor's Office to leaders
Yes, for a businessman, for a businesswoman, there will be special attention from the Police, from the MPF!
- Against
About: grant protective measures without requiring a police report
It's the granting of a protective measure without a police report, based on a subjective criterion.
- Against
About: approve the bill under discussion
Thus, I would even make an appeal to colleagues in the opposition to enter a "no" instruction on the panel against this bill that aims to give special protection by the Police to union leaders, to leaders of NGOs who criticize the Police.
- Against
About: grant priority service from the Public Prosecutor's Office to certain leaders
Priority at the MPF is not reasonable and has nothing to do with protection of women, folks!
- Against
About: approve the bill under discussion
The Opposition has the duty to vote against this bill, the text is bad, the text goes beyond what was in the original bill, there are points that are unrelated to this. Missão's instruction is "no", Mr. President.
- Neutral
About: approve the bill under discussion
Mr. President, just to state Missão's "yes" instruction.
About: approve the bill under discussion
When it's a good bill we speak little so we can vote right away.
About: approve the bill under discussion
Parliament has already approved this measure in that sense; unfortunately President Lula vetoed it, but now we bring this progress. "Yes", Mr. President.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology