Video transcript

Pela Ordem / Explicação Pessoal

9 statements · 1 politicians · August 13, 2025

Statements by Rodrigo Pacheco. 9 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Judiciary.

Speakers

Transcript

9 statements

Full transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.

  1. Rodrigo Pacheco
    President Davi Alcolumbre, Ladies and Gentlemen Parliamentarians, only and solely to record the joy of seeing the name of Appellate Judge Carlos Brandão approved now, who very shortly will be a Minister of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), and likewise to pay my respects to Dr. Maria Marluce Caldas Bezerra, whose hearing will be opened in a moment – and whose name will certainly be approved by the Plenary of the Federal Senate.
  2. Rodrigo Pacheco
    Neutral

    About: unify the jurisprudence of state courts and federal regional courts

    To both, to Minister Carlos Brandão and to Minister Marluce Caldas Bezerra, our confidence that they will join a court absolutely fundamental to democracy, to the rule of law, to the Brazilian Republic, which is the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), created with a very noble purpose and, I repeat, absolutely fundamental for the Judiciary and for Justice in our country, namely the unification of the jurisprudence of the state courts of justice and of the federal regional courts — the six federal regional courts that we have in Brazil.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  3. Rodrigo Pacheco
    Neutral

    About: unify the jurisprudence of state courts and federal regional courts

    The role of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) in fixing and defining the country’s jurisprudence through the application and the force of our federal laws is absolutely essential and must be recognized by us.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  4. Rodrigo Pacheco
    For

    About: strengthen the STJ

    The strengthening of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) will always mean the strengthening of the Judiciary and the easing of demands on the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal), because once the resolution of legal conflicts is achieved within the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), our country’s Supreme Court will naturally be less sought.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  5. Rodrigo Pacheco
    For that reason these two nominees will join with great distinction, since they have brought in their previous careers this very same quality as jurists that they possess.
  6. Rodrigo Pacheco
    Neutral

    About: regulate by law the legal relevance requirement for special appeals to the STJ

    And another point, President Davi Alcolumbre, also very relevant, is the occasion of these two nominations to the STJ (Superior Court of Justice): the recent meeting we had with President Antonio Herman Benjamin, of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), about something that was conceived in the National Congress regarding legal relevance, which was inserted into the Federal Constitution as a requirement for special appeals.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  7. Rodrigo Pacheco
    Neutral

    About: regulate by law the legal relevance requirement for special appeals to the STJ

    What is still missing is the regulation through a law that can, I repeat, regulate this constitutional command, which was inserted into the constitutional amendment at the time of the Presidency of Minister Humberto Martins.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  8. Rodrigo Pacheco
    For

    About: regulate by law the legal relevance requirement for special appeals to the STJ

    Therefore, I would like to urge the entire Plenary of the Federal Senate, the Constitution and Justice Committee, chaired by our dear Senator Otto Alencar, and Your Excellency, that we dedicate ourselves, in this second semester, to legislation that can define the rules for determining the legal relevance of theses that may reach the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), because this will be fundamental to reducing the workload of the ministers of the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), while also reconciling the interests of the legal profession, given that we are in deep dialogue with the OAB, so that there will be, if not unanimous, then majority support for this legislative proposal, which will confer relevance within the STJ (Superior Court of Justice).
    Judiciary → View this statement
  9. Rodrigo Pacheco
    So, that is the statement we would like to make, on the occasion of our congratulations to Minister Carlos Brandão and to Minister Maria Marluce Caldas Bezerra. Thank you very much.
Open at the source ↗

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology