Video transcript
Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)
58 statements · 1 politicians · July 15, 2026
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 58 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Violence Against Women and Protection, Public Safety and Order, Official Documents, Criminal Justice.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
58 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Mr. President, I want to ask permission to farm aura to 'mog' the betinha.
I say this to mock a tweet that was made about the PL of misogyny, Deputy Adriana, by Deputy Tabata Amaral.
She said the following: children who are repeating insults among themselves, calling one another 'sigma' or 'betinha,' are reproducing the industry of misogyny.
I thought that was a big joke, first because of her level of ignorance regarding Generation Z slang.
Sigma is not an insult among children; it's a compliment.
Another thing: being a betinha has nothing to do with hatred of women; it's about making fun of men.
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
So, to place that within the scope of the PL of misogyny, where the discourse is to combat violence against women, where the argument is that it starts with a little joke and ends with the death of a woman, to cite a joke about someone being 'mogado,' someone being a betinha, someone being sigma...
I even feel embarrassed to speak about such a subject in the plenary.
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
This diminishes and shows the Deputy's true intention behind that PL.
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
I even make an appeal, taking advantage of this rare moment, in which, in the pre‑electoral period, the plenary has a significant number of Deputies, to say that this is the true intention.
- Neutral
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
In a debate, Deputy Tabata Amaral said: 'No, I don't want to criminalize the joke, I don't want to criminalize people who are jerks.'
- Neutral
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
She said she never filed a lawsuit against a comedian, but she did file, represented before the Public Prosecutor's Office, requested the imprisonment of a comedian for making a joke, and that comedian was fired from his job.
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
So, we see that the intention is one thing, the hidden agenda behind it is another, and the discourse is yet another.
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
To say that there is an industry behind the 'betinha' speech...
- Against
About: criminalize acts of misogyny
Really, there was nothing left to do except defend a text as absurd as the one that was put forward.
- Neutral
About: publicly speak out in defense of victims of sexual violence
When there was the episode of several minors who carried out a gang rape against girls and boys under 14 years of age, the Deputy did not speak up in defense of those women who suffered the gang rape.
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
When there was the vote on the PEC to reduce the age of criminal responsibility, she voted against the reduction, that is, she voted in favor of minors who rape and commit pedophilia being detained for a maximum of 3 years.
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
So I ask the women of Brazil: do you think it is fair that a kid, a thug, a criminal of 16 or 17 years of age, as we saw happen in São Paulo, who takes part in a gang rape of a woman, would be detained for a maximum of 3 years, or that the toughening of sentence enforcement for heinous crimes, such as rape and femicide, only occurs after recurrence, as was defended by the PT and PSOL here in the plenary?
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
Only after someone kills the second woman, only after someone rapes the second woman, should penal enforcement be toughened?
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Mr. President, the Missão Party advises 'no.' We are voting here on permission to, in official documents, take photos wearing a turban, a cocar (feather headdress), and so on.
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
And the purpose of taking a photo for a document is precisely to be able to recognize the person 100%, to clearly see their face.
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Indeed, for that reason, Deputy Lafayette pointed out that you need to remove your glasses.
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
So it's natural that you need to be able to clearly recognize a person's face.
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
Although the bill states that recognition should be preserved, etc., we know that wearing a turban, a tiara, or any accessory makes it harder to identify someone on the document.
- Against
About: allow use of religious adornments (turban and headdress) in official document photos
I think this should not even be important enough to come to the Plenary, but since it did, I will advise against it.
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
Mr. President, we approved an important bill authored by me.
Today I want to thank the colleagues who voted in favor.
- Neutral
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
It's almost obvious: today, if a sentenced prisoner, with a final judgment, escapes from prison, or if there is already a conviction and he should be arrested and he evades the arrest warrant, the crime can prescribe.
- Neutral
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
So, depending on the crime, he flees for 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, then he can return and present himself to Justice or to a police chief as if nothing had happened, and say: 'Look, I really committed the crime, I was arrested, then I escaped.'
'Because I stayed on the run long enough, I was successful in my escape, the State lost the right to punish me.'
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
What we are doing now is very simple.
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
You were convicted, you fled, you lose the right to prescription (the statute of limitations).
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
The crime will not prescribe while you are on the run, which is obvious; otherwise you are rewarding and encouraging the person to flee, because if he is successful in his escape and not caught within a certain period of time, which will depend on the crime he committed, he can return as if nothing had happened.
So I'm pleased with this approval. I want to thank Deputy Fraga, who was the Rapporteur of this bill and who also led, politically alongside me, this approval in Plenary.
About: interrupt the statute of limitations if a convicted person escapes
I wish and hope that in the Senate — the Senators sometimes sit around in slippers and do not advance projects approved in this House — now this bill will be quickly approved.
- Against
About: approve the bill regulating the games sector
Mr. President, the Missão Party advises a vote against.
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
This is an extensive regulation, 44 pages, which I think would deserve a more thorough analysis.
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
Instead of approving urgency and bringing the matter directly to the Plenary, we should give more time, even so that the party leaders can prepare their technical notes and have a more in-depth debate.
- Neutral
About: approve the bill regulating the games sector
This bill gets into the minutiae of sector regulation; it goes far beyond the current legislation.
About: give more time for analysis and debate of games sector regulation before voting
So I think that, given the length of the bill, it would be important for us to debate it better and discuss it more in the College of Leaders before taking the urgency to the Plenary.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology