Video transcript

Pela Ordem / Explicação Pessoal

26 statements · 1 politicians · June 16, 2026

Statements by Marcos Rogério. 26 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Democracy & Electoral Participation, Criminal Procedure, Penalties and Criminal Procedure, Criminalization of Financial Acts.

Speakers

Transcript

26 statements

Full transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.

  1. Marcos Rogério
    Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen Senators, I will make a very succinct intervention regarding this issue, which has taken the national news this week.
  2. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: preserve credibility and independence of democratic institutions

    And, apart from what Your Excellency presented to the Plenary of the Federal Senate, the first conviction I have is that we must look at all of this very carefully, without wanting to undo the absolutely correct role of the institutions in investigating this case.
  3. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: avoid politicizing investigations

    And one must look carefully, because, at a moment like this, the political debate and the political environment, sometimes for reasons of the most diverse origins, try to put everyone in the same situation, in the same basket.
  4. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    It is a fact that there is an investigation; it is a fact that these investigations are being conducted, within the scope of the STF, by Minister André Mendonça and, within the Federal Police, by a group of investigators.
    Criminal Procedure → View this statement
  5. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    This involves the Prosecutor General's Office, so it is not a single person conducting these investigations.
    Criminal Procedure → View this statement
  6. Marcos Rogério
    And there are two questions we should ask at this moment, aside from what Your Excellency brought to the Plenary.
  7. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    Look: the press reports indicate that an attempt or a proposal for a plea bargain had been rejected by the Federal Police; and, subsequently, it is said that the Prosecutor General's Office also did so, although there are still facts being examined within the Prosecutor General's Office.
  8. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    And here the argument... I am bringing a clipping that the press circulated, because no plea bargain has come to light, no accusatory document has been made public so far.
  9. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    But, based on what the press disclosed, it is said that the Federal Police reject it because, in what would be a cooperation agreement, there was no confession of crime by the person who would be testifying.
  10. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    So, that plea bargain should be dismissed because he does not confess to a crime.
  11. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: investigate payments in foreign accounts as possible crimes

    I question: according to the logic of what was disclosed, is depositing into an international account, in the name of a public official, the amount of US$30 million a crime or not?
    Criminalization of Financial Acts →
  12. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: investigate payments in foreign accounts as possible crimes

    Is it a crime or a normal procedure?
    Criminalization of Financial Acts →
  13. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: verify grounds for rejecting plea bargains in investigations

    So when it is said that the plea bargain is rejected because there is no crime being confessed, it seems to me that the report itself, either by mistake or for some other reason...
  14. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: refrain from defending individuals in the Senate

    What I wanted to say at this moment is that it is not for the Federal Senate, nor for the peers present here, to mount a defense of anyone.
    Role of the State → View this statement
  15. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: ascertain and deepen investigations into the case

    Your Excellency made your own defense, with the conscience you have and with the knowledge of all the information that involves Your Excellency's conduct, but it is up to the institution of the Federal Senate to demand the truth, to demand that the investigation be deepened, to truly identify those who are involved in this plot, involved in this scandal.
    Criminal Procedure → View this statement
  16. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: analyze the political context of accusations and investigations

    Now, another fact — and I will end my statement — is that this happens precisely at a moment after Your Excellency faced, within this Plenary of the Federal Senate, a nomination of someone who was presented to be a Minister of the STF.
    Electoral Process →
  17. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: reject nomination to the STF

    Your Excellency faced — and, for the first time in the history of the Senate, in the last 132 years, the Federal Senate rejected a nomination for Minister of the STF.
  18. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: investigate orchestration of political attacks

    Suddenly, Your Excellency becomes the target of a set of orchestrated attacks...
    Political debate →
  19. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: investigate political motives behind the accusations

    And I repeat: I am not defending Your Excellency, I am pointing to the facts — I am pointing to the facts — and these facts need and deserve to be investigated, but it is fair to ask — it is fair to ask — why this is happening precisely after Your Excellency took that position.
    Political debate → View this statement
  20. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: verify content of collaboration proposals even if formally nonexistent

    So, there are two reflections, and here I do not know whether the Federal Senate will have access, because, if the two cooperation proposals were rejected, they do not exist from a formal, material point of view, but it is necessary to look at what is being said, because it is said they were rejected because there is no confession of crime...
  21. Marcos Rogério
    Neutral

    About: investigate payments in foreign accounts as possible crimes

    But the report says that there was a payment abroad.
  22. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: investigate payments in foreign accounts as possible crimes

    Well, isn't that a crime? Wouldn't that be evidence of a crime?
  23. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: investigate payments in foreign accounts as possible crimes

    Wouldn't that be evidence of a confession of crime?
  24. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: verify and check facts presented in reports and investigations

    Now... So, it is merely... More than anything else, it is to put points to be checked and verified.
  25. Marcos Rogério
    For

    About: open CPIs and impeachment proceedings against government members

    And here I say: the Federal Senate, the National Congress have the proper instruments to deepen the investigation, which is the instrument of CPIs (Parliamentary Inquiry Commissions), but, in addition, there is work being conducted by the Prosecutor General's Office, by the Federal Police and by Minister André Mendonça, whom I regard as one of the most serious men in this country.
  26. Marcos Rogério
    Therefore, I consider Your Excellency's remarks this afternoon absolutely timely, which make us all reflect on this.
Open at the source ↗

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology