Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about assess the substitute's constitutionality and legality before voting

About: assess the substitute's constitutionality and legality before voting

Sérgio Moro: I will go straight to the analysis, Mr. President. The Chamber of Deputies' Substitute to Bill 226 returns for deliberation to the Federal Senate, after review by the Chamber of Deputies, pursuant to the provisions of art. 65 of the Federal Constitution and arts. 285, 286 and 287 of the Internal Rules of the Federal Senate.

First of all, it is important to state that the referred text is adequate with respect to the formal aspects of constitutionality, legality and regimental conformity, there being no obstacle in this regard to its approval.

Sérgio Moro · 0:19

Sérgio Moro: On the merits, in our view, the Chamber of Deputies' substitute improved the text of the proposal in two points, both in the caput of art. 310-A, in the form of the bill: (a) the reference to crimes against sexual dignity, which is broader than the reference to crimes against sexual freedom and sexual crimes against vulnerable persons, and (b) the mention of heinous crimes.

Sérgio Moro: Indeed, these modifications expand the circumstances for the collection of biological material from a person arrested in flagrante delicto, thus constituting measures that contribute to criminal investigation and to the security of society.

Why it was classified this way · 75% confidence

Affirms the text's formal adequacy, describing the legal condition without explicitly requesting approval.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology