Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about criminally hold authors of defamation and incitement on the Internet accountable

About: criminally hold authors of defamation and incitement on the Internet accountable

Kim Kataguiri: And the most commonly used example in legal doctrine is that in the United States you do not have the right to shout "fire" inside a movie theater, because you will cause danger and harm to other people, even though, in theory, that might fall under freedom of expression.

Kim Kataguiri: Here in Brazil, and I defend a doctrine that is more compatible with our legal system, which comes from Roman law and German law, which is that you should be held responsible for the damage you cause when you accuse, for example, someone unjustly of a crime.

When you falsely attribute criminal conduct — if I say someone stole and I don't prove it, raped, murdered and I don't prove it — I must be held accountable for that.

Kim Kataguiri · 3:20

Kim Kataguiri: In the same way, if I incite crime, if I recruit people for organized crime, if I tell or encourage people to use drugs, encourage people to... to join the PCC, the Comando Vermelho, for example, I don't think there should be unrestricted freedom of expression, no.

Desconhecido: Just to pick up on this, returning a bit to the question of factions, of criminal organizations, in your assessment, what happens to national sovereignty?

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

says falsely imputing criminal conduct should lead to accountability.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology