Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about apply the principle of reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings

About: apply the principle of reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings

Sérgio Moro: Notice that in criminal procedure, in criminal law, one needs to have evidence, and one needs to have evidence beyond any reasonable doubt.

Sérgio Moro: This is a fundamental guarantee within criminal proceedings; it is the presumption of innocence that is so often invoked in relation to the powerful and in relation to certain crimes such as white-collar crimes, but which is largely ignored in cases of this kind involving humbler people.

I, personally, make no distinction: the presumption of innocence is a right for everyone, but it must be taken seriously.

Sérgio Moro · 6:12

Sérgio Moro: In particular, regarding that sentence, in addition to the disproportion of the penalties – 14 years for a Pix of R$500 – it seems to me that the argumentative and evidentiary leap to say that those R$500 did indeed represent financing for an attempted coup or the execution of a coup is something that is not justified.

Sérgio Moro: And we see these moments... And people may ask why worry about a businessman in Santa Catarina?

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

Declares not to make distinctions and to defend the presumption of innocence for all.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology