Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about apply the principle of reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings

About: apply the principle of reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings

Sérgio Moro: Did he imagine that that transportation would, in fact, be for that purpose and not for a peaceful demonstration here on the Esplanade of Ministries?

Sérgio Moro: Notice that in criminal procedure, in criminal law, one needs to have evidence, and one needs to have evidence beyond any reasonable doubt.

This is a fundamental guarantee within criminal proceedings; it is the presumption of innocence that is so often invoked in relation to the powerful and in relation to certain crimes such as white-collar crimes, but which is largely ignored in cases of this kind involving humbler people.

Sérgio Moro · 5:51

Sérgio Moro: I, personally, make no distinction: the presumption of innocence is a right for everyone, but it must be taken seriously.

Sérgio Moro: In particular, regarding that sentence, in addition to the disproportion of the penalties – 14 years for a Pix of R$500 – it seems to me that the argumentative and evidentiary leap to say that those R$500 did indeed represent financing for an attempted coup or the execution of a coup is something that is not justified.

Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence

states that the presumption of innocence is a fundamental guarantee.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology