Marcos Rogério: Does that prevent Parliament, a little further on, from returning to debate the issue of amnesty?
Marcos Rogério: No. What we are doing here today is correcting an excess.
This bill comes as an instrument of restoration of criminal justice, because — I said it in the CCJ and repeat it here — faced with a single hammer blow, without the right to appeal, without the right to an appeal, the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) convicted hundreds of Brazilians, without them being able to appeal, without being able to seek recourse, in a court of exception, because this matter should not have been in the STF; and, being in the STF, the competence should have been of the Plenary, which also did not happen; it went to one of the STF's chambers; and, in the chamber it went to, the trial should have been by impartial ministers, judges, which also did not happen, because the majority there had impediment or some sort of suspected bias.
Marcos Rogério: But they overcame everything to carry out an unconstitutional trial.
Marcos Rogério: But does that change the fact, the reality for these people?