Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about prevent statute of limitations on sentences for convicts who remain fugitives

About: prevent statute of limitations on sentences for convicts who remain fugitives

Kim Kataguiri: Now, placing it in the Justice system — already clogged with cases, as we have today — with the same degree, the same quality, the same gravity as the serious crimes that are already prioritized?

Kim Kataguiri: Regarding the other point, the budgetary appropriation, Brazil also has many serious problems, and each municipality, each state and the Union itself need to understand which measures are most urgent to take, without us creating any kind of rigid budgetary linkage or prioritization enshrined in law. Our recommendation is "no."

Mr. President, regarding this bill, I think the law should already be like this.

Kim Kataguiri · 453:00

Kim Kataguiri: Unfortunately, if we were to explain this to the people out there, it would be incomprehensible.

Kim Kataguiri: Today, in the case of a convict who escapes from prison — it has already been proven that he committed a crime, the sentence has already become final — if he remains at large for a sufficient amount of time, the crime prescribes, that is, the State loses the right to punish that criminal, because too much time has passed from the moment he committed that crime, from the moment the right to punish him was secured, until the moment of that punishment.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

says the law should already prevent the statute of limitations from running for fugitives.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology