Video transcript

Sessão Deliberativa Extraordinária Semipresencial (AM nº 123/2020)

6 statements · 1 politicians · July 14, 2026

Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 6 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Judiciary.

Speakers

Transcript

6 statements

Full transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.

  1. Kim Kataguiri
    For

    About: rationalize processes at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice)

    Mr. President, the MISSÃO instructs 'no'. We are creating a rule here to rationalize the proceedings at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice).
    Judiciary → View this statement
  2. Kim Kataguiri
    Neutral

    About: create exceptions to fundamental rights and guarantees in the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) procedural rule

    The motion from PT (Workers' Party) states the following: 'If it is a fundamental right or guarantee, we create an exception.'
    Judiciary →
  3. Kim Kataguiri
    Against

    About: create exceptions to fundamental rights and guarantees in the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) procedural rule

    In Article 5 alone, there are 79 subsections. So a rule that has 79 exceptions is not a rule.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  4. Kim Kataguiri
    For

    About: adjudicate at the appropriate instance (first instance when applicable)

    Another point, which Deputy Pedro Uczai — who is looking at me here — made, which worries me and I think was not what he meant, is: 'How can we allow fundamental rights and guarantees to be adjudicated in the first instance, to be adjudicated in the second instance?' Well, if we consider that the first and second instance courts are not competent enough — judges and appellate judges — to adjudicate fundamental rights and guarantees, we will close down the Judiciary and leave only the higher courts.
    Judiciary → View this statement
  5. Kim Kataguiri
    I do not believe that is exactly what the Deputy said he meant.
  6. Kim Kataguiri
    Against

    About: create exceptions to fundamental rights and guarantees in the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) procedural rule

    However, once again, if we want to bring rationality to the system and bring only matters of major public impact, we need to reject the motion.
    Judiciary → View this statement
Open at the source ↗

AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology