Video transcript
Kim Kataguiri - MINHA RESPOSTA E MEU DESAFIO À TABATA AMARAL Eu não sabia que ela ti...
17 statements · 1 politicians · July 15, 2026 · 2 min
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 17 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified. Topics: Gender equality, Religious Freedom / Free Expression, Public Safety and Order.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
17 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
I didn't know Tabata Amaral had such basic cognitive problems.
She said I was exposed, that I said she wanted to imprison children and that after reading her own tweet I would have contradicted myself.
First, let's do a basic exercise in Aristotelian logic here: premise, premise, conclusion.
First premise: you say that the expressions "Betinha", "Sigma", used by children, are sexist expressions, are misogynistic expressions, are expressions that, in the end, lead to violence... against women.
- Neutral
About: approve legislation criminalizing acts of misogyny in the Chamber of Deputies
Very well, you want to criminalize misogyny.
These children are using misogynistic expressions.
- Against
About: approve legislation criminalizing acts of misogyny in the Chamber of Deputies
Therefore, the consequence of these two premises is that you want to imprison children.
So, people can disagree with my logical construction from A to B or read your tweet and understand that this follows from what you yourself wrote.
- Neutral
About: create legal mechanisms that enable censoring opinions
And another point: you put in your text the power for a judge to suspend a social media account.
At the same time you said that I blocked my comments.
I didn't block comments, okay?
It's a basic Instagram feature.
You follow, you can comment.
Follow there, comment, reply.
If, with your fallacy, you enter into contradiction with your own tweet, you will be more than welcome.
Or, if you actually have the courage, we can do a face-to-face debate, on whatever media outlet you want, about your bill, about your tweet, about your abstract concept of misogyny and about, ultimately, an identity-politics agenda.
About: reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years
Because, when it came down to it, when we went to vote on lowering the age of criminal responsibility, including... in the wake of a collective case, collective, committed by kids of 16, 17 years old, bums, scoundrels, actual perpetrators of violence against women, you went there and voted against the PEC to lower the age of criminal responsibility.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology