Video transcript
KIM: fim da ESCALA 6x1 é uma MENTIRA!
197 statements · 1 politicians · February 12, 2026 · 18 min
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 197 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
197 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
This PEC isn't going to change anything for the 40 million informal workers, because they're informal.
We're going to increase informality.
People will keep working on a 6x1 schedule without a formal employment contract.
If they actually wanted to end the 6x1 schedule by law, there wouldn't be a PEC; a bill would be enough.
It's only a PEC because they want to spend the whole year dragging out a discussion in the CCJ, in a special committee, to create a political platform.
Picking up the thread, the Chamber of Deputies is now focused on ending the 6x1 schedule, right, which President Hugo has even signaled.
that the intention is to vote by May.
How do you evaluate this agenda?
Are you in favor of this reduction in working hours?
Do you believe in that deadline he gave—by May—to vote on this matter, which is a PEC, right?
We know that a larger quorum is required to approve it in two rounds.
Well, first, I think, nobody is in favor of the 6x1 schedule.
It's not good, and I myself worked the 6x1 schedule; it was my first job.
And, by the way, this PEC wouldn't change anything about my first job because it was informal.
And this is one of the aspects where I strike against the populism and demagogy of this PEC, because there are 40 million informal workers.
This PEC will change nothing for the 40 million informal workers, because they are informal.
We'll increase informality.
People will continue to work the 6x1 schedule without a formal employment contract.
So that's the first populist and demagogic aspect.
Second, if they truly wanted to end the 6x1 schedule by law, there wouldn't be a PEC?
There would be a law.
Because there is no limitation on reducing working hours in the Constitution.
There is a limitation for increasing working hours.
So a bill would suffice.
It's only a PEC because they don't want to vote.
It's only a PEC because they want to spend the whole year dragging out the discussion in the CCJ, in a special committee, to create a political platform.
No one wants to end it.
And another point.
We've already had the experience of a PEC that said it would guarantee rights, that said it would end exhausting workloads, which is the PEC for domestic workers.
Ten years ago.
The promise from the Dilma government was: no, now the domestic worker will have rights, now the domestic worker will receive more, now the domestic worker will work less.
What happened?
Informality increased.
You couldn't find domestic workers anymore and everyone found day laborers instead, to avoid an employment relationship.
There was even a very good debate about the 6x1 schedule between Arthur Duval and Deputy Alfredinho, in which Deputy Alfredinho was defending the end of the 6x1 schedule, etc.
And then, incidentally, he mentioned, "look, there's a woman who cleans my house twice a week; I'm not the one who cleans, right?"
Then Arthur asked, "But does she have a formal employment contract?"
He said, "No, she's a day laborer."
He said, "So you yourself, who say you defend the end of the 6x1 schedule, who defend formal employment ties, don't hire your day laborer with a contract, because you don't want there to be an employment tie."
So, that's what will happen.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology