Video transcript
BOLSONARO PRESO: por que isso está acontecendo?
119 statements · 1 politicians · November 24, 2025 · 11 min
Statements by Kim Kataguiri. 119 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
119 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
The STF formed a majority to uphold Jair Bolsonaro's preventive detention.
And I want to make this video for you to say that of the three elements that underpinned Bolsonaro's preventive detention, for those who have already seen my short video, I changed my position because there was a fundamental change in the facts in the third rationale.
to learn Jair Bolsonaro.
and I want to go into this more calmly in this video for you, right after you subscribe to the channel, click the bell to receive notifications and leave a like.
Well, let's go.
I will also outline in this video the background, not only of everything Bolsonaro did that led him to be placed under preventive detention, but also what will lead him to be imprisoned definitively, now that his conviction has practically become final.
Okay... Three fundamental elements in Bolsonaro's arrest.
My opinion about two of them hasn't changed because those two remained the same.
The change is in the third point.
First point.
A vigil was called in front of Bolsonaro's house and that can cause disorder, it can increase the risk of flight because in the middle of the ruckus he could escape.
Well, first point.
A person who is under house arrest cannot be held responsible for the acts of third parties.
Moreover, in any case in criminal law, you cannot be held accountable for a third party's act without your own participation, without your intention in some way to participate in that act that a third person is carrying out.
So that's the first point.
A person calling a vigil in front of their house—first, lack of security is not a justification, because let's face it it wouldn't mobilize that many people, since this Bolsonaro issue is already very worn out and it was something called at the last minute and concentrated in Brasília, which is not a large urban center.
So there wouldn't be many people.
Another point here: asking to reinforce security with the military police.
there would also be no impediment regarding that.
And another point is that the Federal Police are literally inside his house, so it's very difficult for there to be a risk of flight.
So that first rationale does not hold.
The second rationale is that Jair Bolsonaro was very close to embassies, so he could easily go to the Argentine or the U.S. embassy and seek asylum there.
Well, his house is there and he was placed under house arrest.
His house has always been exactly the same distance from the embassies, both before and now.
Therefore, the location of his house is not a justification to order preventive detention, especially because since he was put under house arrest the distance from his house to the embassies hasn't changed.
Neither his house moved nor did the embassies move.
So there is no basis for that.
And then the third justification, which indeed changed, is that there was tampering with Bolsonaro's ankle monitor.
Alexandre de Moraes did not go into detail, and that was his mistake, not going into detail in the preventive detention decision when he talks about the ankle monitor violation.
In fact, he speaks of an attempt to tamper with it, and does not go into details.
Because when he only writes that, anything could have happened.
It's normal for the ankle monitor's signal to drop for a period.
It's normal that there may have been some problem such that it even needs to be replaced.
You need to give a timeframe for that person to provide information about why during that period there was a problem with the ankle monitor.
Because it can be for various reasons.
But now we have proof that Bolsonaro jammed a soldering iron into the ankle monitor.
That is grounds to order preventive detention, there is no doubt about that.
Desconhecido
Equipment 85916-5.
Desconhecido
Did you use something to burn this?
Desconhecido
I had a hot iron there.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology