Video transcript
Pela Ordem / Explicação Pessoal
21 statements · 1 politicians · December 2, 2025
Statements by Sérgio Moro. 21 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
21 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Mr. President, I would also like to record here my unreserved solidarity with Your Excellency, with the stance you took, and my indignation regarding the criticism.
One of the things we hear most about the Federal Senate and its constitutional prerogatives is how the names that are often nominated to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) get through and are always approved.
Historically, back in Floriano Peixoto, there was a rejection of Barata Ribeiro.
This criticism is very recurrent. And suddenly there is a nomination and part of what I heard from public opinion in recent days criticized Your Excellency, as if we had to simply rubber-stamp the name put forward by the Executive.
And there wasn't even an indication in that direction from Your Excellency, but merely the setting of a schedule.
And when Your Excellency set that schedule, you began to be criticized, as if it were an obligation for this Chamber to proceed differently or as if it were absolutely necessary that we approve that name.
No. It is the President's prerogative to nominate whoever he believes he should nominate, within the constitutional requirements, and it is the Senate's prerogative to approve or not approve that name, by conducting a confirmation hearing that, in my view, must be rigorous, which should examine the individual's curriculum vitae, his legal knowledge and his legal thinking, because legal thinking is not mathematics; it is not linear.
It is not simply about administering a knowledge test here, but rather about conducting questioning to ask the candidate what he thinks about relevant legal issues, including constitutional ones.
So I do not understand the criticisms made last week of Your Excellency to the effect that we should simply say "amen" to the Executive's choices.
And I do not even know what the outcome will be, whether this nomination will actually take place, how the confirmation hearing will be conducted, whether it will be approved or not.
Now, criticizing the Senate and criticizing the Presidency of the Senate for the exercise of the Senate's constitutional prerogatives, in my view, is absurd, not least because, generally, the criticism runs the other way — that the Senate does not conduct the confirmation hearing appropriately and always approves the nominees.
And when there is a signal of "We will hold a rigorous hearing; it may be approved, it may, eventually, be rejected," Your Excellency is criticized.
Moreover, with the planting in the press of defamatory information regarding Your Excellency, which everyone here knows you never treated this matter from that perspective, that you are only defending here the prerogative of the Senate and its independence with respect to the Executive Branch.
What does public opinion want? That the Senate be handed over to the Presidency of the Republic?
That every bill submitted here be approved?
That every nominee forwarded here be approved?
Then there would be no need for the Senate. I wish to record my solidarity with the spirit of hauteur and independence with which Your Excellency conducted yourself in this case, and to regret the fact that this nomination — the sending of the presidential message — was not made.
That, indeed, is a reprehensible maneuver by the President of the Republic to prevent the hearing from taking place.
I hope it will be submitted one day so that we may examine it.
Now, if this House exercises its prerogatives and approves the name or rejects it, it must be respected.
This type of criticism cannot be tolerated, and the criticism that was aimed at Your Excellency is, at bottom, criticism aimed at this entire House, including the tradition, very well represented by the bust of Ruy Barbosa that stands above all of us here in this House. That is all, Mr. President.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology