Video transcript
O que as Big Techs NÃO QUEREM que você saiba sobre a REGULAMENTAÇÃO DAS REDES
104 statements · 1 politicians · October 6, 2025 · 6 min
Statements by Tabata Amaral. 104 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
104 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Desconhecido
Hi everyone, this is Tabata.
Before watching this video, go ahead and leave your like down below, subscribe to the channel and hit the bell to receive more content like this.
Agreed?
Thank you very much and let's get to the video.
Desconhecido
But you mentioned the issue of social networks.
Desconhecido
And you were victimized in a vile way.
A pornographic video made with artificial intelligence, fake news about my father's suicide, there was everything in that regard.
Very, very low.
Desconhecido
So now, let's go.
Desconhecido
Are you in favor?
Desconhecido
Of regulating social networks.
Desconhecido
I am the author of the bill.
Desconhecido
I know, I know.
Desconhecido
I want you to talk about that.
And you have to talk about it.
Look, ultimately it's all about money.
And this conversation about regulating social networks is too. In my first term, some time ago, I, delegate Alessandro Vieira, deputy Felipe Rigoni, a serious group, joined with dozens of civil society specialists to design a bill to regulate social networks.
What doesn't the bill do?
The bill does not censor content.
That.
To be very honest, I'm very worried about what grandma or uncle is writing on their Facebook post.
What does the bill do?
It puts in some rules, like algorithmic transparency.
I can't have an algorithm that, for example, favors hate speech, or that favors one political party and doesn't favor the other.
What's the second thing the bill does?
Transparency of funding.
You can't have content coming to you that you think is organic, but that in fact someone paid money to that platform for that content to reach a lot of people.
Another thing: bots.
Why does X, Twitter, take down some bots and not others?
Because it increases engagement, it increases profit.
And then the platforms saw this regulatory bill and began to be against it.
Why?
Because they would lose money.
If you can't have an algorithm... that, well, promotes hateful content.
If you have to be transparent, if you have to disclose who is putting money in, of course you lose money.
And then these platforms began, many of them, to fund fake news against the bill, saying that the bill wanted to censor.
Desconhecido
And they went on to mobilize the far right.
Exactly, and we tried to bring this bill to a vote three times, if I'm not mistaken, and we never succeeded.
Why?
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology