Video transcript
Eduardo Bolsonaro dispara: 'O Brasil vive sob o regime de um único ministro todo-poderoso.
58 statements · 1 politicians · June 9, 2025 · 5 min
Statements by Flavio Bolsonaro. 58 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
58 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Desconhecido
Brazil should have had the maturity to fix its own mess at home.
Desconhecido
But does he force us to come out here abroad?
Desconhecido
I mean, a judge from one of the toughest public exams in Brazil, a federal deputy—jeez, the most voted in history—forces us to come out here to do this work.
Desconhecido
Because we no longer have any hope that the angel Gabriel will hover over Moraes's head and put some sense into that head.
Desconhecido
I was afraid Moraes would sanction me.
Desconhecido
Oh, is he a TCU employee?
Desconhecido
Is he a minister of the TCU?
Desconhecido
He's going to have to do his job properly.
Desconhecido
He won't be able to let things slide, no.
Yeah, and exactly for that reason, besides Moraes, there's another bunch of people — I mentioned the judges, right — and also Delegate Fábio Schorr, who will very likely, together with Moraes, face these sanctions.
Although they may say, just like the Nazis at the Nuremberg Tribunal said, 'I was just following orders'... That doesn't hold up, that's over.
I was just following orders and I shot a Jew in the back of the neck — you didn't know that was wrong?
Hold on, right, let's at least have the minimum of human rights.
And anyway, returning to the matter of several warnings... I also wanted to remind you that, for example, Representative Chris Smith, after he held a public hearing in the American Congress where Paulo Figueiredo, Chris Pavlovski, Michael Schellenberg and another left-wing representative spoke, Representative Chris Smith sent a letter to Moraes asking Moraes, look, is this really true what Paulo Figueiredo said, etc.?
Is it true that you took down the profiles of so-and-so to give Alexandre de Moraes a chance to defend himself?
And he did that sending copies to the president of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal), president of the TSE (Superior Electoral Court), president of the Chamber of Deputies, president of the Senate. Of course it's not a judicial proceeding, it's an American lawmaker asking a question to the Brazilian judge.
But, as you said, here they follow everything to the letter.
Even though one might already imagine, already know that Moraes is a dictator, he is still given the right to a defense.
And that letter from the DOJ, the Department of Justice, which is headed by Pem Bond, the former prosecutor here in Florida, by coincidence, at one of the dinners of the... of the Trump inauguration celebrations, she sat at my table at the Vice President Dinner — I have a photo with her.
She warned Moraes on May 7 about all of this that is happening.
It's the famous five-page law lesson she gave, talking about extraterritoriality, etc.
Which Moraes, apparently, solemnly ignored; he didn't fix any of his conduct; on the contrary, he keeps abusing all of his power.
But this DOJ, under it — to make a rough comparison, folks...
It's like our Ministry of Justice, you know.
Under our MJ, what do we have?
We have the PF, the PRF, we have a whole lot of structure.
Here in the United States, under the DOJ, there's also a huge structure.
Among them, not only the FBI, but the U.S.
Marshals.
When you receive a letter rogatory, who usually knocks on your door is the U.S.
Marshals.
It's the people who have been representing the DOJ.
So, for Alexandre de Moraes.
to hear me in this inquiry he just opened, together with the PGR and Paulo Bonet, he has to prepare a report explaining everything nicely, send it to the Brazilian central authority, so the Brazilian central authority can forward it to the DOJ.
The DOJ, Pembond, will have that letter rogatory arrive on her desk and she will analyze it to look at the legal aspects of his request to hear me, to see if there is any illegality, if it doesn't conflict with American law.
She makes a value judgment regarding that.
If she deems it pertinent, then she sends it to the person to be summoned, and that's what the law prescribes.
There are other mechanisms, it's not a miracle, but don't come to my house to talk.
I'm talking about the main thing, which is the letter rogatory.
So, imagine you who are listening to me now here.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology