Video transcript
A lógica das redes distorceu o debate político
98 statements · 1 politicians · August 13, 2025 · 8 min
Statements by Tabata Amaral. 98 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
98 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Hi everyone, this is Tabata.
Before watching this video, leave your like below, subscribe to the channel and hit the bell to receive more content like this.
Sound good?
Thanks so much — let's get to the video.
Desconhecido
You took part in an extremely atypical campaign, I would say, last year.
Desconhecido
We were talking about education, in another sense of the word — there was a lot of rudeness, chair attacks, punches, people leaving debates bleeding.
Desconhecido
You yourself were the target of a really low fake news item involving your father's memory.
Desconhecido
What can we foresee?
Desconhecido
In terms of the atmosphere, in terms of the overall tone heading into next year's elections?
First, Carol — I meant... Carolina, sorry.
I wanted to challenge those watching to understand why São Paulo's election turned out the way it did.
I remember a specific debate, the one on Flow, which was a debate in which my opponents performed especially poorly.
Marçal made it very clear that he didn't know what he was talking about, that he had no respect for people.
The mayor couldn't control himself, he attacked a voter, defended a zip-line for a person with a disability.
It was a debate where I looked to the side and said, no, no way.
People are seeing what I'm seeing.
These people have no respect for those who live in our city.
And then the debate ended and I said, no, no way.
People are seeing.
You know, we were gaining ground.
I was still largely unknown, so I had the challenge of introducing myself.
And then, in the last three seconds of the debate, one of Marçal's aides punched one of Nunes's aides.
And right then I understood everything.
And I said, that's it.
They know that those who watched the debate saw that they are in no condition to be mayors of our city.
But they also know that many people didn't watch the debate.
And people will only see what reverberates on WhatsApp and social media.
So when there's a punch, whether planned or not, they get what they wanted.
No one would talk about the zip-line the mayor defended for the person in a wheelchair, no one would talk about the mayor's attack on the voter, no one would talk about Marçal's unpreparedness and disrespect.
Everyone would only share the video of the punch.
And then I left that debate, even swearing a bit, which got a lot of attention.
But because that was my feeling, it's a big circus so people don't see what's happening, don't see what's at stake, so the voter is manipulated.
So that's the risk.
I'm not afraid of debates.
I was the only candidate who went to all 11 debates against Marçal.
I'm not afraid of a fight.
I'm out there on social media and in the streets, every day defending what I believe in.
But the fact is that even the debate itself is being distorted.
In this logic that you only need a 30-second clip to post on social media.
You don't have to prepare, you don't have to study, you don't need a team, you don't have to be humble, you don't have to go out into the streets.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology