Video transcript
A VERDADE SOBRE A PEC DA SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA
51 statements · 1 politicians · October 30, 2025 · 4 min
Statements by Renan Santos. 51 transcribed statements, with topic and stance on the ones the analysis classified.
Speakers
Click any statement beside the video to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Transcript
51 statementsFull transcript of the video. Statements the analysis classified carry topic and stance.
Lula's government is taking advantage of the public security crisis in Rio de Janeiro and the deaths of police officers to push not just its pro-criminal agenda.
Now they're moving forward with the idea of a Public Security PEC.
A PEC that the PT filed years ago and that they are now turning into a solution for all our problems.
And guess what?
That's the catch.
Lula, the official federal government website, influencers of all kinds.
They all say this is the way.
And you, a person who fights organized crime, might think.
Ah, a Public Security PEC would be good.
The malice, however, is in the detail.
This PEC seeks to create a kind of SUS for public security.
It consolidates the entire command of the police — which is state-level and in the hands of the governors — with the federal government.
And guess who the partners are — you'll love them.
Article 144, paragraph 9 of this PEC.
It leaves a clear message.
The Unified Public Security System shall be coordinated by a National Public Security Council, with the participation of the Federal Executive Branch, the States, the Federal District, the Municipalities and Civil Society, pursuant to the law.
And then, look.
There will be the so-called representatives of civil society.
And who appoints those very representatives?
By the federal government.
There's currently a watered-down version of that.
Which establishes this idea of coordination alongside the federal government.
Still fragile.
All right.
to the Council.
And on the Council, guess who the current government appointed to represent the interests of civil society?
Well, since 2019 they have been Instituto Solda Paz, Instituto Igarapé and Instituto Conectas.
All human rights NGOs strongly tied to the left and that receive international money from those same groups as always.
Ford Foundation, Open Society Foundation, NGOs that advocate... criminalization of the police, NGOs that push for minimal criminal penalties, NGOs that argue that imprisoning many people is wrong, that the right thing is to leave them free and resocialize them.
In other words, we've put the foxes in charge of the henhouse.
To give you a practical example of this, in 2023 Flávio Dino, when he was Minister of Justice, set up a council with those same NGOs to deal, of all things, with police lethality.
This is the same group that's now out on the streets issuing indignant manifestos about what happened in Rio de Janeiro.
They are the people who defend that everything should remain as it is, that you can't be angry or else you're racist, that any urge to help the police or to clear out those horrible favelas where people are treated like animals by the drug traffickers is just a fascism you carry inside of you.
If this Public Security PEC passes... These guys will have total power to control police performance, lethality, and to investigate whether the police are erring according to their criteria.
Biased criteria — criteria of people who defend, above all, the trafficker and not the citizen.
All this would culminate in total control — greater control the federal government would have over the police, in a Bolivarian model the PT has wanted since the start of its administrations.
To a large extent, the state police, in the hands of the governors, have always been a counterbalance, a response to this authoritarian tendency that the PT had.
Given that the PT does not control the police, police.
Nor does it control the army.
Controlling this through a new structure, a superstructure, would be the wet dream of all the tyrants who are in that group.
AI classification from the transcript of a public video. See the Methodology