Judiciary and Public Spending

Janja just said that the nickname "gastadeira" (big spender), to her, is misogyny — that is, if you, a Brazilian worker, wake up early and sleep late, and feel disrespected by someone who doesn't hold public office but uses public structures to even have a parallel office that has already cost 1.2 million of your money, and you want to criticize her for blowing people’s money on luxurious international trips, you're misogynistic.

A person who takes trips to Italy, Paris, London, Abu Dhabi, and a Government that has already spent 7 billion on international travel...

And it doesn't stop there. Lula, not satisfied with having someone enjoying public money, even put the trip that funded Janja's visit to New York in 2024 under secrecy — he did not provide information about it.

On the other side, you have Janja dancing on the COP 30 yacht, also sustained with your money.

You can't criticize Janja's absurd spending, because otherwise it's misogyny.

You call everyone together, sit down with them, okay?

For example, what share of primary spending does the judiciary represent?

And I'm not referring to payroll, perks, any of that — I'm talking about something else.