Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about adjudicate at the appropriate instance (first instance when applicable)

About: adjudicate at the appropriate instance (first instance when applicable)

Sérgio Moro: I had already said this before, several jurists had said it before, former Minister Marco Aurélio Mello had highlighted this fact of the lack of jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).

Sérgio Moro: And when one forces, argumentatively, a change in jurisprudence of more than 20 years to bring about or to maintain that jurisdiction with regard to former President Jair Bolsonaro in this criminal case, in this investigation, it is evident that it ends up generating a discomfort; it ends up seeming that there was, let's say, a forcing of the argument so that this case would remain in the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).

And there is one more reason why this case and also the January 8 protesters should not have stayed in that Court: the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) feels attacked.

Sérgio Moro · 4:23

Sérgio Moro: It was, in fact, invaded by those protesters.

Sérgio Moro: So, it is a court that feels assaulted, and a court that feels assaulted is not the best forum to have the necessary serenity to judge those protesters or even now the case of former President Bolsonaro and the generals.

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

argues that the attacked court is not the proper forum, suggesting remand.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology