Analyzed statement

What Sérgio Moro said about require that conversion of arrest in flagrante to preventive detention be decided at the custody hearing when circumstances exist

About: require that conversion of arrest in flagrante to preventive detention be decided at the custody hearing when circumstances exist

Sérgio Moro: With regard to the other innovations contained in the Chamber's substitute, we consider them to be adjustments of lesser importance, and it is preferable to maintain the text approved by the Federal Senate.

Sérgio Moro: It is important to maintain paragraph 5 regarding art. 310 of the CPP, since it is there that the custody hearing is addressed.

Indeed, that is precisely the main objective of the proposal: to expressly add the circumstances that recommend the conversion of an arrest in flagrante to preventive detention, which should occur at the custody hearing.

Sérgio Moro · 1:53

Sérgio Moro: Hence also the indispensability of the provision contained in paragraph 6, deleted by the reviewing House, since it is intended that the judge be required to pronounce on the circumstances of paragraph 5, in order to reduce the indiscriminate granting of provisional release at the custody hearing.

Sérgio Moro: With regard to the collection of biological material, we understand that there is no need for it to be carried out by a forensic expert.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

States that the conversion should occur at the custody hearing, arguing it should be obligatory.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology