Analyzed statement

What Romeu Zema said about ensure independence between branches and respect for voters' representation

About: ensure independence between branches and respect for voters' representation

Romeu Zema: On amnesty, the ministers of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) have already pointed out that they would consider amnesty for crimes of a coup d'état unconstitutional, based on clauses 43 and 44 of Article 5 of the Constitution.

Romeu Zema: On the other hand, deciding who will judge or re-judge those involved in January 8 is also not a presidential prerogative.

The President of the Republic cannot come out and say that this trial doesn't count now or that it will be a different trial.

Romeu Zema · 99:22

Romeu Zema: A trial, for example, at first instance (in a lower court), which is one of the arguments of many of the lawyers for those involved on January 8.

Romeu Zema: So, I wanted to ask you, what is the practical solution for this impact?

Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence

states that the president cannot invalidate court rulings (constitutional description).

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology