Analyzed statement

What Rodrigo Pacheco said about apply retroactivity of the more favorable criminal law to allow regime progression for the January 8 prisoners

About: apply retroactivity of the more favorable criminal law to allow regime progression for the January 8 prisoners

Rodrigo Pacheco: Your Excellency had every good intention — and even discussed it with me — so that we would have a bill that could balance that law which is now being applied as a result of that recent event.

Rodrigo Pacheco: Your Excellency had every good intention of resolving that issue, but there was resistance from those who were not necessarily concerned with the January 8 detainees, who were concerned with other aspects and other people, and they failed to consider that bill at that time.

It has been six months without it having been considered and people are serving sentences when, in fact, they could possibly already have progressed in regime due to an adjustment, by virtue of the retroactivity of a more lenient criminal law that could apply to them.

Rodrigo Pacheco · 8:29

Rodrigo Pacheco: Your Excellency led this, and I am a witness, because you asked me to carry out a technical analysis regarding that bill.

Rodrigo Pacheco: Unfortunately, there were resistances, even from those we would not have imagined could resist.

Why it was classified this way · 88% confidence

States that prisoners could have already had a regime progression if a more lenient law were applied retroactively.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology