Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about grant urgency to the project's processing

About: grant urgency to the project's processing

Mr. President, we instruct 'yes' and, in the same sense as Deputy Gilson, we also wanted to record the Missão party's vote on both urgency motions that were previously voted. Thank you.

Kim Kataguiri · 148:45

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, article 74 of the Procurement Law already addresses the case of inexigibility when there is only a single supplier, when there is only a single agent capable of supplying that product, supplying that service, a case which today is already the reality at Hemobrás.

Kim Kataguiri: So, in my assessment, extending it — and I believe there is even a problem of legislative technique, there will be disagreement when discussing the jurisprudence of this new wording at the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) — I find it problematic to include a new provision for public institutions exclusively for the health system, exclusively for a new product, when today it is already not required when there is a single company.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

declares a vote guidance of 'sim' and that the party will maintain its vote on the motions.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology