Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about allow each country to define its own terrorist organizations

About: allow each country to define its own terrorist organizations

Desconhecido: Isn't there a risk with that decision by the United States?

Kim Kataguiri: No.

First, because we consider — I just cited for you the example of Hezbollah — we do not violate the sovereignty of Arab countries by Brazil considering Hezbollah to be a terrorist organization, as practically the whole free world considers.

Kim Kataguiri · 4:02

Kim Kataguiri: So it is a unilateral act of sovereignty by the country itself to decide... which organizations your country considers terrorist or non-terrorist?

Kim Kataguiri: And it doesn't matter whether they are national or international.

Why it was classified this way · 80% confidence

argues it is an act of sovereignty for a country to designate terrorist organizations.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology