Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about grant tax incentives and local content policies for industry

About: grant tax incentives and local content policies for industry

Kim Kataguiri: When it's time to cut into their own flesh to bring benefits to the worker, no Deputy supports it, very few support it.

Kim Kataguiri: Now, when it comes to populism and demagoguery, we'll have 450 votes on the panel.

Mr. President, Party Mission directs "no", first because this is a very poorly designed public policy to grant a tax privilege that won't have any analysis for national benefit.

Kim Kataguiri · 206:08

Kim Kataguiri: Moreover, all the tax privileges that are said to be temporary, in the end become permanent without any review to see if they worked well, if they in fact brought sovereignty, if they in fact brought national fertilizer production to a competitive level.

Kim Kataguiri: Another point is the local content policy aspect that this fertilizer production is bringing in the rapporteur's latest text, which was changed at the last minute, bringing this aspect as well, to which we are absolutely opposed.

Why it was classified this way · 90% confidence

declares a 'não' stance because it is a poorly designed tax benefit.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology