Analyzed statement

What Kim Kataguiri said about increase the Executive's decision-making power over the budget

About: increase the Executive's decision-making power over the budget

Kim Kataguiri: And it seems once again a benefit that we create now to be temporary, but that will always be extended, prolonged over the years, until it never ends. PARTY MISSION directs "no".

Kim Kataguiri: Mr. President, Party Mission directs "no". We already have a budget that is 92% mandatory spending, and here another mandatory expense is being created, not by the Constitution, but by infraconstitutional legislation.

The Executive needs to have Executive power. It's only in Brazil that we live this budgetary schizophrenia, in which the Executive Branch decides less than half of where the budget goes.

Kim Kataguiri · 219:56

Kim Kataguiri: And are we going to lock in even more spending?

Kim Kataguiri: Even if there is an agreement with the Government to limit the amount to be sent in the PLOA, we are still positivizing, we are putting into law that we will have an ongoing, mandatory expense. Hence our opposing position, Mr. President.

Why it was classified this way · 85% confidence

argues the Executive should decide more on budget allocation.

Excerpt from a public video, transcribed and classified by AI. See the Methodology