[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"transcript-717aa807-136d-4275-adfd-eb7cce6ccae5-en":3,"footer-top-topics-en":338,"footer-top-speakers-en":389,"transcript-poster-717aa807-136d-4275-adfd-eb7cce6ccae5":495},{"falas":4,"lang":326,"meta":327},[5,14,28,36,43,54,60,68,77,83,92,100,107,113,122,131,142,147,154,162,167,176,182,191,195,200,205,210,216,222,229,234,238,244,249,255,263,268,275,282,288,294,298,303,314,320],{"idx":6,"utterance_id":7,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":10,"start_s":6,"end_s":11,"word_count":12,"indexable":13},0,"51978","Sérgio Moro","sergio-moro","Thank you. Senators, Madam Senators, Acting President, Senator Eduardo Girão, whom I greet, Senator Esperidião Amin, the trial at the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) ends up attracting everyone's attention.",11.994784876140809,25,false,{"idx":15,"utterance_id":16,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":17,"start_s":11,"end_s":18,"word_count":19,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":26,"indexable":27},1,"51979","And Minister Luiz Fux, whom I particularly admire as a judge, today emphasized in his vote, still in progress, what, in my view, is the original sin of this whole process: the question of the jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",31.66623207301173,41,"poder-judiciario","Judiciary","3653ad52-b10a-4d0e-81c7-080d7d72b727","assign jurisdiction to the STF to try ex-Presidents","contra",0.9,"calls the competence a 'pecado original' and criticizes its attribution.",true,{"idx":29,"utterance_id":30,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":31,"start_s":18,"end_s":32,"word_count":33,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":34,"rationale":35,"indexable":27},2,"51980","I have said, and with respect to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal), that it was a big mistake for it to assume that jurisdiction to try this case and likewise that of the January 8 protesters, and the reason is very simple.",50.378096479791395,39,0.95,"says explicitly that it was 'um grande erro' for the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) to assign that competence.",{"idx":37,"utterance_id":38,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":39,"start_s":32,"end_s":40,"word_count":12,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":41,"rationale":42,"indexable":27},3,"51981","In the case in question, Bolsonaro is a former President, he is no longer President, so the basis for special jurisdiction by virtue of office no longer applies.",62.3728813559322,0.8,"states that, as a former President, the prerogative that attracts jurisdiction was removed.",{"idx":44,"utterance_id":45,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":46,"start_s":40,"end_s":47,"word_count":48,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":49,"target_proposition":50,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":52,"rationale":53,"indexable":13},4,"51982","And let us make clear that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) had a jurisprudence embodied in Súmula 394.",70.04954367666232,16,"cc5170e5-044b-433e-8497-63fb84ec5a3c","extend foro por prerrogativa de função beyond time in office (Súmula 394)","neutro_descritivo",0.7,"reports the existence of Súmula 394 without making a proposal.",{"idx":55,"utterance_id":56,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":57,"start_s":47,"end_s":58,"word_count":48,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":49,"target_proposition":50,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":52,"rationale":59,"indexable":13},5,"51983","Súmula 394 extended the special jurisdiction by virtue of office beyond the period in which the office was held.",77.72620599739244,"explains the content of Súmula 394 descriptively.",{"idx":61,"utterance_id":62,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":63,"start_s":58,"end_s":64,"word_count":65,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":49,"target_proposition":50,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":66,"rationale":67,"indexable":27},6,"51984","It said: 'If the crime is committed during the exercise of the function, the special jurisdiction by prerogative of office prevails, even if the inquiry or criminal action is initiated after the cessation of that exercise.'",92.59973924380704,31,0.75,"quotes the wording of the súmula verbatim, without commenting.",{"idx":69,"utterance_id":70,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":71,"start_s":64,"end_s":72,"word_count":73,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":74,"target_proposition":75,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":66,"rationale":76,"indexable":27},7,"51985","However, Súmula 394 was revoked, in a point of order in Criminal Action 315, at the time still under Minister Moreira Alves.",103.15514993481096,22,"20ee3e72-c03e-4c8f-afc4-39c901afaf19","revoke application of Súmula 394","reports the revocation of the súmula in a historical process.",{"idx":78,"utterance_id":79,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":80,"start_s":72,"end_s":81,"word_count":82,"indexable":13},8,"51986","That was in 1999, and the judgment was published in 2001.",107.95306388526728,10,{"idx":84,"utterance_id":85,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":86,"start_s":81,"end_s":87,"word_count":88,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":89,"target_proposition":90,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":52,"rationale":91,"indexable":13},9,"51987","Since then — look, we're talking about 1999 — the STF understood that jurisdiction by prerogative of forum, prerogative of office, no longer extended to those who had ended their term or had left the office that attracted the special jurisdiction by virtue of office.",130.503259452412,47,"f6f76474-2157-4ed5-ac8f-814efa6997e3","do not extend judicial privilege (foro por prerrogativa de função) to former officeholders after leaving office","describes the STF's (Supreme Federal Tribunal) post-1999 understanding in an informative way.",{"idx":82,"utterance_id":93,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":94,"start_s":87,"end_s":95,"word_count":96,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":97,"target_proposition":98,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":52,"rationale":99,"indexable":13},"51988","The STF, however, at the beginning of this year, in March 2025, in a case not related, it is true, to this Bolsonaro case or to that of the January 8 protesters, decided to alter that understanding.",147.77574967405474,36,"c00ad39e-c43b-4351-ac72-482439db1f65","limit the scope of privileged jurisdiction","reports that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) changed its position in 2025 without proposing action.",{"idx":101,"utterance_id":102,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":103,"start_s":95,"end_s":104,"word_count":105,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":97,"target_proposition":98,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":106,"indexable":27},11,"51989","It changed a consolidated jurisprudence of more than 20 years, which, at the moment, came to seem like an ad hoc change, that is: 'We do not have jurisdiction to try and prosecute former President Jair Bolsonaro because of our jurisprudence that dates from 1999, but we will change it now,' and that made it possible to argue now, in this criminal case pending before the STF, that they had such jurisdiction.",178.48239895697523,64,"criticizes the change as 'alteração de ocasião' and opportunism.",{"idx":108,"utterance_id":109,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":110,"start_s":104,"end_s":111,"word_count":112,"indexable":13},12,"51990","That does not change the fact that Alexandre Ramagem, Federal Deputy, is listed as a defendant in the criminal case.",186.63885267275097,17,{"idx":114,"utterance_id":115,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":116,"start_s":111,"end_s":117,"word_count":118,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":119,"target_proposition":120,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":41,"rationale":121,"indexable":27},13,"51991","Why? Because, although he is today a Federal Deputy, the facts imputed to him, the actions imputed to him, are prior to the exercise of his mandate.",199.59322033898306,27,"d19af34b-4e58-4557-bc14-e5e2fc4fb9c1","assign jurisdiction to the STF to try individuals for acts committed before their term","asserts that facts prior to the mandate remove original jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",{"idx":123,"utterance_id":124,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":125,"start_s":117,"end_s":126,"word_count":127,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":128,"target_proposition":129,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":130,"indexable":27},14,"51992","So, from any perspective, there is no original jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) here, either for investigation or for the trial of the criminal case.",211.10821382007822,24,"430348e2-80d6-4b9c-b421-3c849a67cdd3","assign jurisdiction to the STF to investigate and try individuals after leaving office","directly declares that there is no original jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",{"idx":132,"utterance_id":133,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":134,"start_s":126,"end_s":135,"word_count":136,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":140,"rationale":141,"indexable":27},15,"51993","And here Minister Fux was courageous in pointing out this preliminary issue right at the start: 'It is not for the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) to judge this case.'",222.14341590612776,23,"1e37c0c8-49cd-4af6-bb89-0d710f3f6dba","adjudicate at the appropriate instance (first instance when applicable)","a_favor",0.92,"praises a vote that states 'não cabe ao STF' and advocates transfer.",{"idx":48,"utterance_id":143,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":144,"start_s":135,"end_s":145,"word_count":118,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":66,"rationale":146,"indexable":27},"51994","I had already said this before, several jurists had said it before, former Minister Marco Aurélio Mello had highlighted this fact of the lack of jurisdiction of the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",235.09778357235982,"cites jurists and their own position against that attribution.",{"idx":112,"utterance_id":148,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":149,"start_s":145,"end_s":150,"word_count":151,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":97,"target_proposition":98,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":152,"rationale":153,"indexable":27},"51995","And when one forces, argumentatively, a change in jurisprudence of more than 20 years to bring about or to maintain that jurisdiction with regard to former President Jair Bolsonaro in this criminal case, in this investigation, it is evident that it ends up generating a discomfort; it ends up seeming that there was, let's say, a forcing of the argument so that this case would remain in the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",263.40547588005217,59,0.88,"refers to 'forçação' of the argumentation to change jurisprudence.",{"idx":155,"utterance_id":156,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":157,"start_s":150,"end_s":158,"word_count":159,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":160,"rationale":161,"indexable":27},18,"51996","And there is one more reason why this case and also the January 8 protesters should not have stayed in that Court: the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) feels attacked.",277.79921773142115,30,0.85,"argues that the attacked court is not the proper forum, suggesting remand.",{"idx":163,"utterance_id":164,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":165,"start_s":158,"end_s":166,"word_count":78,"indexable":13},19,"51997","It was, in fact, invaded by those protesters.",281.6375488917862,{"idx":168,"utterance_id":169,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":170,"start_s":166,"end_s":171,"word_count":172,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":173,"target_proposition":174,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":160,"rationale":175,"indexable":27},20,"51998","So, it is a court that feels assaulted, and a court that feels assaulted is not the best forum to have the necessary serenity to judge those protesters or even now the case of former President Bolsonaro and the generals.",300.8292046936115,40,"050d17ee-1042-4916-8cea-412466fa1077","refer cases against January 8 protesters to first-instance courts","claims the court under attack lacks the composure to judge the protesters.",{"idx":177,"utterance_id":178,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":179,"start_s":171,"end_s":180,"word_count":181,"indexable":13},21,"51999","It is natural that, having been attacked, the court reacts in a way that seeks to preserve its dignity, its sovereignty, but with a certain excess toward its aggressors.",316.1825293350717,32,{"idx":73,"utterance_id":183,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":184,"start_s":180,"end_s":185,"word_count":33,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":41,"rationale":190,"indexable":27},"52000","In my view, it is this factor that explains the exacerbation of those sentences imposed on the protesters of 17 years, 18 years, 14 years, because one smeared a statue with lipstick, because another sat in one of the Ministers' chairs.",334.8943937418514,"justica-criminal","Criminal Justice","dc347d4b-25e0-4300-a956-d26d4e8c5b9c","review and reduce sentences applied to those convicted for the January 8 acts","attributes the excessive sentences to the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal)'s reaction and asks for correction.",{"idx":136,"utterance_id":192,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":193,"start_s":185,"end_s":194,"word_count":82,"indexable":13},"52001","I am not saying that those acts were correct.",339.69230769230774,{"idx":127,"utterance_id":196,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":197,"start_s":194,"end_s":198,"word_count":168,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":199,"indexable":27},"52002","No, they were reprehensible, they were wrong and must pay for their mistakes, but not in the absolute disproportion we are seeing.",349.2881355932204,"acknowledges protesters' wrongdoing but criticizes the disproportionality of the sentences.",{"idx":12,"utterance_id":201,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":202,"start_s":198,"end_s":203,"word_count":155,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":34,"rationale":204,"indexable":27},"52003","It would be more appropriate that these cases be referred to the first instance, as was the case of former President Lula.",357.9243807040417,"explicitly proposes remitting the cases to the first instance.",{"idx":206,"utterance_id":207,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":208,"start_s":203,"end_s":209,"word_count":168,"indexable":13},26,"52004","Under the consolidated jurisprudence of more than 20 years, since 1999, Lula was no longer serving as President.",367.5202086049544,{"idx":118,"utterance_id":211,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":212,"start_s":209,"end_s":213,"word_count":214,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":51,"stance_confidence":52,"rationale":215,"indexable":13},"52005","For that reason, he was tried in the first instance, and was able to appeal to the second instance, in which he was likewise convicted, and was able to appeal to the third instance, the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), in which he was also convicted, until that political turnaround came and nullities were found there — in my view, nonexistent — which led to, let's say, a change in the former President's situation, who was released and later was even able to run for the Presidency of the Republic, without ever having been declared, by the way, innocent.",407.34289439374186,83,"cites the example of Lula's trial in lower courts.",{"idx":217,"utterance_id":218,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":219,"start_s":213,"end_s":220,"word_count":118,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":152,"rationale":221,"indexable":27},28,"52006","So, the original sin of this case, in the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal), concerns jurisdiction, as was very well put in Minister Luiz Fux's vote today.",420.29726205997395,"reiterates that jurisdiction is the 'pecado original' of the case.",{"idx":223,"utterance_id":224,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":225,"start_s":220,"end_s":226,"word_count":227,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":97,"target_proposition":98,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":228,"indexable":27},29,"52007","And I do not see how the STF can justify that a jurisprudence of more than 20 years, of 25 years, be abruptly altered to justify the trial of this case before the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal).",437.0899608865711,35,"says they see no justification to change 25 years of precedent.",{"idx":159,"utterance_id":230,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":231,"start_s":226,"end_s":232,"word_count":114,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":34,"rationale":233,"indexable":27},"52008","It would do the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) well to remit this case to the first instance.",443.32724902216427,"explicitly proposes that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) remit the case to the first instance.",{"idx":65,"utterance_id":235,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":236,"start_s":232,"end_s":237,"word_count":82,"indexable":13},"52009","Thus it would show: 'Look, we do not have a specific interest in this cause.'",448.12516297262056,{"idx":181,"utterance_id":239,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":240,"start_s":237,"end_s":241,"word_count":242,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":137,"target_proposition":138,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":41,"rationale":243,"indexable":27},"52010","'We have a specific interest in the maintenance of the law', and the STF itself would still have appellate competence; it could judge this case in the future, in any eventual appeal that reached its hands.",463.95827900912644,33,"justifies remand by stating the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) would retain appellate jurisdiction.",{"idx":242,"utterance_id":245,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":246,"start_s":241,"end_s":247,"word_count":177,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":248,"indexable":27},"52011","But the STF did not have, at least since 1999, competence to prosecute and try a former President of the Republic.",474.03389830508473,"asserts that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) did not have jurisdiction since 1999.",{"idx":250,"utterance_id":251,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":252,"start_s":247,"end_s":253,"word_count":136,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":22,"target_proposition":23,"stance":24,"stance_confidence":152,"rationale":254,"indexable":27},34,"52012","And it is very difficult for us to accept that, suddenly, it recovered that competence this year in order to be able to judge former President Bolsonaro.",485.06910039113427,"says it is hard to accept that the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal) 'recuperou' this jurisdiction.",{"idx":227,"utterance_id":256,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":257,"start_s":253,"end_s":258,"word_count":123,"topic_slug":20,"topic_label":21,"target_id":259,"target_proposition":260,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":261,"rationale":262,"indexable":13},"52013","Let's hope that this vote is the beginning of putting things back in their place.",491.78617992177317,"aeb7eff4-90fc-499e-b590-4ddc7516d28c","maintain the STF's 1999 understanding that limited foro por prerrogativa de função",0.65,"hopes the vote will begin the 'recolocação das coisas no lugar'.",{"idx":96,"utterance_id":264,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":265,"start_s":258,"end_s":266,"word_count":267,"indexable":13},"52014","If the STF proceeds to the merits and evaluates that merit, I saw in Minister Flávio Dino's vote yesterday — I read commentary, because I could not watch it in full — his reference to the possibility of recognizing minor participation for some of the accused, among them some military officers who appear on the defendant's side.",519.1342894393742,57,{"idx":269,"utterance_id":270,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":271,"start_s":266,"end_s":272,"word_count":273,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":274,"indexable":27},37,"52015","And I would say the following: if they are to be convicted and, at the same time, minor participation is recognized, then let that understanding be extended, whether in the panel (Turma) or eventually in the Plenary, in a review, to those January 8 protesters.",539.2855280312907,42,"asks that the lesser benefit be extended to the protesters.",{"idx":276,"utterance_id":277,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":278,"start_s":272,"end_s":279,"word_count":280,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":281,"indexable":27},38,"52016","Because, if we think about it, if this prosecution thesis that there was an attempted coup on January 8 prevails — with which I disagree — but if that thesis prevails and there is to be conviction of the generals, recognizing minor participation and therefore reducing the sentence, as our Penal Code allows, then that benefit should also be extended to those protesters.",572.870925684485,70,"if lesser participation is recognized for generals, asks the same measure be applied to the protesters.",{"idx":33,"utterance_id":283,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":284,"start_s":279,"end_s":285,"word_count":286,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":41,"rationale":287,"indexable":27},"52017","If the Generals had minor participation, those January 8 protesters had much less importance; in the attempted coup version, regarding which I have already said I disagree, they would at most have been a mass of maneuver, a pawn of minor importance, much inferior to that of any other participant in that criminal scheme narrated by the Office of the Attorney General (Procuradoria-Geral da República).",603.0977835723598,63,"minimizes the role of the protesters to justify sentence reduction.",{"idx":172,"utterance_id":289,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":290,"start_s":285,"end_s":291,"word_count":292,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":34,"rationale":293,"indexable":27},"52018","So let this trial, at the STF (Supreme Federal Tribunal), be used to make the necessary correction of the sentencing dosimetry for the January 8 protesters, reducing their sentences, perhaps even unifying the sentencing dosimetry of the attempted coup d'état with the attempted abolition of the democratic rule of law, because it is a single crime.",629.9661016949153,56,"proposes using the trial to correct and reduce the protesters' sentences.",{"idx":19,"utterance_id":295,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":296,"start_s":291,"end_s":297,"word_count":273,"indexable":13},"52019","This has already been demonstrated in the votes of Minister Barroso, which were defeated in the Plenary, in Minister André Mendonça's vote, which was defeated in the Plenary, and I also imagine that it is embodied in Minister Fux's vote, which is still in progress.",650.1173402868318,{"idx":273,"utterance_id":299,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":300,"start_s":297,"end_s":301,"word_count":151,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":34,"rationale":302,"indexable":27},"52020","Let that opportunity be used, then, at least to seek a correction of that dosimetry with respect to those absolutely simple and humble people who did err, yes, in the feeling of mob, of crowd, but who do not deserve two years in pretrial detention, more than two years in pretrial detention, and likewise do not deserve sentences of 18, 17 or 14 years in prison.",678.425032594524,"criticizes preventive measures and long sentences, asking for correction for humble convicts.",{"idx":304,"utterance_id":305,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":306,"start_s":301,"end_s":307,"word_count":308,"topic_slug":309,"topic_label":310,"target_id":311,"target_proposition":312,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":313,"indexable":27},43,"52021","Of course we can try to correct all this, Senator Girão, here, through amnesty in this Congress, but it would be much better for the STF to take advantage of this opportunity to itself make this necessary correction at least of the dosimetry, because I cannot imagine that the STF is satisfied with the imposition of such high sentences on these individuals.",704.8135593220339,55,"poder-legislativo","Legislative Branch","124cc6f8-ba28-4c3e-91de-d09b0232a0da","approve amnesty for January 8 protesters in the National Congress","proposes an amnesty in Congress as a way to remedy the situation.",{"idx":315,"utterance_id":316,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":317,"start_s":307,"end_s":318,"word_count":269,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":160,"rationale":319,"indexable":27},44,"52022","And this trial is an opportunity for the STF to demonstrate — I won't say mercy, though mercy too — but, above all, to demonstrate justice, justice for those protesters and the application of the law in relation to them, with the due corrections.",722.5658409387223,"asks that the trial demonstrate justice and make the necessary corrections.",{"idx":321,"utterance_id":322,"speaker_name":8,"speaker_slug":9,"text":323,"start_s":318,"end_s":324,"word_count":217,"topic_slug":186,"topic_label":187,"target_id":188,"target_proposition":189,"stance":139,"stance_confidence":25,"rationale":325,"indexable":27},45,"52023","If they are to be convicted, let the sentences at least be proportional to their responsibility, which was small in these episodes. Thank you very much. (During the speech d",736,"demands penalties proportional to responsibility, criticizing excessive sentences.","en",{"job_id":328,"title":329,"source_url":330,"platform":331,"content_type":332,"published_at":333,"n_classified":334,"speakers":335},"717aa807-136d-4275-adfd-eb7cce6ccae5","Pronunciamento","https:\u002F\u002Fwww12.senado.leg.br\u002Fportalcedoc\u002Fpcedoc\u002F2025\u002F20250910\u002F20250910153102_1973978.MP4","senado","senado_speech","2025-09-10T18:13:00Z",46,[336],{"name":8,"slug":9,"photo_url":337,"n_falas":334},"\u002Fprofiles\u002Fsergio-moro\u002Fphoto.png",{"limit":82,"offset":6,"topics":339,"total":388},[340,345,350,355,360,365,368,373,378,383],{"label":341,"n_speakers":206,"n_utterances":342,"n_videos":343,"slug":344},"National Security",2695,190,"seguranca-nacional",{"label":346,"n_speakers":181,"n_utterances":347,"n_videos":348,"slug":349},"Education",1685,229,"educacao",{"label":351,"n_speakers":136,"n_utterances":352,"n_videos":353,"slug":354},"Public Safety and Order",1580,244,"seguranca-publica-e-ordem",{"label":356,"n_speakers":242,"n_utterances":357,"n_videos":358,"slug":359},"Combating Impunity",1469,292,"combate-a-impunidade",{"label":361,"n_speakers":181,"n_utterances":362,"n_videos":363,"slug":364},"Monetary Policy",1448,303,"politica-monetaria",{"label":21,"n_speakers":136,"n_utterances":366,"n_videos":367,"slug":20},846,149,{"label":369,"n_speakers":217,"n_utterances":370,"n_videos":371,"slug":372},"Public Service",788,178,"servico-publico",{"label":374,"n_speakers":12,"n_utterances":375,"n_videos":376,"slug":377},"Public Health \u002F Public Safety",756,139,"saude-publica-seguranca-publica",{"label":379,"n_speakers":217,"n_utterances":380,"n_videos":381,"slug":382},"Social Policy",684,197,"politica-social",{"label":384,"n_speakers":73,"n_utterances":385,"n_videos":386,"slug":387},"Fiscal Reform",671,134,"reforma-fiscal",625,{"limit":82,"offset":6,"speakers":390,"total":269},[391,405,418,429,437,448,459,468,475,484],{"slug":392,"name":393,"party":394,"role":394,"state":394,"n_speeches":395,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":396,"photo_url":400,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":401,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":403},"renan-santos","Renan Santos","",22525,[397,398,399],"Abuse of Authority","Administrative and Labor Reform","Affirmative action","\u002Fprofiles\u002Frenan-santos\u002Fphoto.png","Q51882553","none",{"twitter":404},"@RenanSantosMBL",{"slug":406,"name":407,"party":394,"role":394,"state":408,"n_speeches":409,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":410,"photo_url":414,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":415,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":416},"romeu-zema","Romeu Zema","MG",12888,[411,412,413],"Agriculture & Agribusiness","Amnesty and Jan 8 Characterization","Anti-Discrimination","\u002Fprofiles\u002Fromeu-zema\u002Fphoto.png","Q57092113",{"twitter":417},"@RomeuZema",{"slug":419,"name":420,"party":394,"role":394,"state":394,"n_speeches":421,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":422,"bio_short":394,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":426},"pablo-marcal","Pablo Marçal",12772,[423,424,425],"Agricultural Policy","Business Environment","Campaign Financing",{"twitter":427,"youtube":428},"@pablomarcal","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.youtube.com\u002F@pablomarcall",{"slug":430,"name":431,"party":394,"role":394,"state":432,"n_speeches":433,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":434,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":435,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":436},"fernando-haddad","Fernando Haddad","SP",12647,[423,411,413],"Q3069485",{},{"slug":438,"name":439,"party":394,"role":394,"state":440,"n_speeches":441,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":442,"photo_url":444,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":445,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":446},"ronaldo-caiado","Ronaldo Caiado","GO",12538,[398,399,443],"Agribusiness & Regional Development","\u002Fprofiles\u002Fronaldo-caiado\u002Fphoto.png","Q10364348",{"twitter":447},"@ronaldocaiado",{"slug":449,"name":450,"party":394,"role":451,"state":432,"n_speeches":452,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":453,"photo_url":455,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":456,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":457},"tarcisio","Tarcisio","Governador",11298,[454,423,411],"Age of Criminal Responsibility","\u002Fprofiles\u002Ftarcisio\u002Fphoto.png","Q60392579",{"twitter":458},"tarcisiogdf",{"slug":460,"name":461,"party":394,"role":394,"state":394,"n_speeches":462,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":463,"photo_url":465,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":466,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":467},"luis-inacio-lula-da-silva","Luis Inacio Lula da Silva",10531,[423,411,464],"Benefits fraud & efficiency","\u002Fprofiles\u002Fluis-inacio-lula-da-silva\u002Fphoto.png","Q37181",{},{"slug":469,"name":470,"party":394,"role":394,"state":394,"n_speeches":471,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":472,"bio_short":394,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":474},"augusto-cury","Augusto Cury",8912,[443,473,423],"Agribusiness \u002F Environment",{},{"slug":476,"name":477,"party":394,"role":394,"state":432,"n_speeches":478,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":479,"photo_url":480,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":481,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":482},"kim-kataguiri","Kim Kataguiri",8748,[398,454,411],"\u002Fprofiles\u002Fkim-kataguiri\u002Fphoto.png","Q21715169",{"twitter":483},"@KimKataguiri",{"slug":485,"name":486,"party":394,"role":394,"state":487,"n_speeches":488,"consistency_score":6,"top_topics":489,"photo_url":491,"bio_short":394,"wikidata_id":492,"mandate_status":402,"social_links":493},"flavio-bolsonaro","Flavio Bolsonaro","RJ",8066,[423,411,490],"Anti-Fascism","\u002Fprofiles\u002Fflavio-bolsonaro\u002Fphoto.png","Q10283057",{"twitter":494},"@FlavioBolsonaro",null]